POWW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intuitive Machines has a net margin of -22.81% compared to Outdoor Holding's net margin of -18.23%. Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -42.12% beat Intuitive Machines's return on equity of -362.52%.

Outdoor Holding has a consensus price target of $2.20, signalling upside risk potential of 65.41%. On the other hand Intuitive Machines has an analysts' consensus of $15.56 which suggests that it could grow by 50.51%. Given that Outdoor Holding has higher upside potential than Intuitive Machines, analysts believe Outdoor Holding is more attractive than Intuitive Machines.

Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intuitive Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Outdoor Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intuitive Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding pays -2.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Intuitive Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues are -$42.2M, which are smaller than Intuitive Machines quarterly revenues of $62.5M. Outdoor Holding's net income of -$77.5M is lower than Intuitive Machines's net income of -$11.4M. Notably, Outdoor Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intuitive Machines's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding is 3.17x versus 3.85x for Intuitive Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Momentus has a net margin of -22.81% compared to Outdoor Holding's net margin of -1916.77%. Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -42.12% beat Momentus's return on equity of -4939.96%.

Outdoor Holding has a consensus price target of $2.20, signalling upside risk potential of 65.41%. On the other hand Momentus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49195.76%. Given that Momentus has higher upside potential than Outdoor Holding, analysts believe Momentus is more attractive than Outdoor Holding.

Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Momentus has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.602%.

Outdoor Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Momentus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding pays -2.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Momentus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues are -$42.2M, which are smaller than Momentus quarterly revenues of $322K. Outdoor Holding's net income of -$77.5M is lower than Momentus's net income of -$6.2M. Notably, Outdoor Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Momentus's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding is 3.17x versus 1.66x for Momentus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Labs PBC has a net margin of -22.81% compared to Outdoor Holding's net margin of -19.06%. Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -42.12% beat Planet Labs PBC's return on equity of -22.92%.

Outdoor Holding has a consensus price target of $2.20, signalling upside risk potential of 65.41%. On the other hand Planet Labs PBC has an analysts' consensus of $6.47 which suggests that it could grow by 12.62%. Given that Outdoor Holding has higher upside potential than Planet Labs PBC, analysts believe Outdoor Holding is more attractive than Planet Labs PBC.

Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Labs PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Outdoor Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Labs PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding pays -2.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Labs PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues are -$42.2M, which are smaller than Planet Labs PBC quarterly revenues of $66.3M. Outdoor Holding's net income of -$77.5M is lower than Planet Labs PBC's net income of -$12.6M. Notably, Outdoor Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Labs PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding is 3.17x versus 6.57x for Planet Labs PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sidus Space has a net margin of -22.81% compared to Outdoor Holding's net margin of -2689.64%. Outdoor Holding's return on equity of -42.12% beat Sidus Space's return on equity of -121.5%.

Outdoor Holding has a consensus price target of $2.20, signalling upside risk potential of 65.41%. On the other hand Sidus Space has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 528.93%. Given that Sidus Space has higher upside potential than Outdoor Holding, analysts believe Sidus Space is more attractive than Outdoor Holding.

Outdoor Holding has a beta of 1.157, which suggesting that the stock is 15.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sidus Space has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Outdoor Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sidus Space offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Outdoor Holding pays -2.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Sidus Space pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Outdoor Holding quarterly revenues are -$42.2M, which are smaller than Sidus Space quarterly revenues of $238.5K. Outdoor Holding's net income of -$77.5M is lower than Sidus Space's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, Outdoor Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sidus Space's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Outdoor Holding is 3.17x versus 4.39x for Sidus Space. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.