POCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AptarGroup has a net margin of -31.24% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of 11%. Precision Optics's return on equity of -34.86% beat AptarGroup's return on equity of 14.16%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AptarGroup has an analysts' consensus of $148.43 which suggests that it could grow by 18.35%. Given that AptarGroup has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe AptarGroup is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AptarGroup has a beta of 0.577, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.257%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AptarGroup offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AptarGroup pays out 36.45% of its earnings as a dividend. AptarGroup's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than AptarGroup quarterly revenues of $909.3M. Precision Optics's net income of -$1.3M is lower than AptarGroup's net income of $100M. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AptarGroup's PE ratio is 31.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.66x versus 3.00x for AptarGroup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Daxor has a net margin of -31.24% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of --. Precision Optics's return on equity of -34.86% beat Daxor's return on equity of 5.22%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Daxor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 194.03%. Given that Daxor has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Daxor is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Daxor has a beta of -0.508, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.824%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Daxor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Daxor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are larger than Daxor quarterly revenues of --. Precision Optics's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Daxor's net income of --. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Daxor's PE ratio is 26.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.66x versus 14.70x for Daxor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanara MedTech has a net margin of -31.24% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of -13.19%. Precision Optics's return on equity of -34.86% beat Sanara MedTech's return on equity of -19.67%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sanara MedTech has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.43%. Given that Sanara MedTech has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Sanara MedTech is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanara MedTech has a beta of 1.574, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.373%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sanara MedTech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sanara MedTech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than Sanara MedTech quarterly revenues of $21.7M. Precision Optics's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Sanara MedTech's net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sanara MedTech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.66x versus 3.70x for Sanara MedTech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Warby Parker has a net margin of -31.24% compared to Precision Optics's net margin of -2.12%. Precision Optics's return on equity of -34.86% beat Warby Parker's return on equity of -10.25%.

Precision Optics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Warby Parker has an analysts' consensus of $22.23 which suggests that it could fall by -13.57%. Given that Warby Parker has higher upside potential than Precision Optics, analysts believe Warby Parker is more attractive than Precision Optics.

Precision Optics has a beta of 0.291, which suggesting that the stock is 70.901% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Warby Parker has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Precision Optics has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Warby Parker offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Precision Optics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Warby Parker pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Precision Optics quarterly revenues are $4.2M, which are smaller than Warby Parker quarterly revenues of $192.4M. Precision Optics's net income of -$1.3M is higher than Warby Parker's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Precision Optics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Warby Parker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Precision Optics is 1.66x versus 4.15x for Warby Parker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.