PLMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Indemnity Group LLC has a net margin of 20.56% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 11.42%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63% beat Global Indemnity Group LLC's return on equity of 6.09%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand Global Indemnity Group LLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 54.28%. Given that Global Indemnity Group LLC has higher upside potential than Palomar Holdings, analysts believe Global Indemnity Group LLC is more attractive than Palomar Holdings.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.131% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Indemnity Group LLC has a beta of 0.422, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.788%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Indemnity Group LLC offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC pays out 57.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Indemnity Group LLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.4M, which are larger than Global Indemnity Group LLC quarterly revenues of $111.8M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M is higher than Global Indemnity Group LLC's net income of $12.8M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while Global Indemnity Group LLC's PE ratio is 12.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 5.36x versus 1.10x for Global Indemnity Group LLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICC Holdings has a net margin of 20.56% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 8.42%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63% beat ICC Holdings's return on equity of 9.55%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand ICC Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Palomar Holdings has higher upside potential than ICC Holdings, analysts believe Palomar Holdings is more attractive than ICC Holdings.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.131% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICC Holdings has a beta of 0.322, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.79%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ICC Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICC Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.4M, which are larger than ICC Holdings quarterly revenues of $24.4M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M is higher than ICC Holdings's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while ICC Holdings's PE ratio is 10.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 5.36x versus 0.75x for ICC Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NMI Holdings has a net margin of 20.56% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 55.88%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63% beat NMI Holdings's return on equity of 17.98%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand NMI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 17.6%. Given that NMI Holdings has higher upside potential than Palomar Holdings, analysts believe NMI Holdings is more attractive than Palomar Holdings.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.131% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NMI Holdings has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.311%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NMI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NMI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.4M, which are smaller than NMI Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M is lower than NMI Holdings's net income of $92.8M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while NMI Holdings's PE ratio is 8.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 5.36x versus 4.76x for NMI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tiptree has a net margin of 20.56% compared to Palomar Holdings's net margin of 2.41%. Palomar Holdings's return on equity of 20.63% beat Tiptree's return on equity of 6.8%.

Palomar Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.15%. On the other hand Tiptree has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -78.03%. Given that Palomar Holdings has higher upside potential than Tiptree, analysts believe Palomar Holdings is more attractive than Tiptree.

Palomar Holdings has a beta of 0.359, which suggesting that the stock is 64.131% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tiptree has a beta of 1.305, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.501%.

Palomar Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tiptree offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Palomar Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree pays out 98.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Tiptree's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Palomar Holdings quarterly revenues are $148.4M, which are smaller than Tiptree quarterly revenues of $494.4M. Palomar Holdings's net income of $30.5M is higher than Tiptree's net income of $11.9M. Notably, Palomar Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.94x while Tiptree's PE ratio is 21.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palomar Holdings is 5.36x versus 0.40x for Tiptree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.