OFLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of -16.81%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10892037.97%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 353.454%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Omega Flex's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.53x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.22x versus 0.11x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 7.4%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.63%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.633%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $163.9M. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is lower than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.53x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 21.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.22x versus 1.47x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smith & Wesson Brands has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 1.44%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Smith & Wesson Brands's return on equity of 7.9%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Smith & Wesson Brands has an analysts' consensus of $13.83 which suggests that it could grow by 34.44%. Given that Smith & Wesson Brands has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Smith & Wesson Brands is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smith & Wesson Brands has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.562%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Smith & Wesson Brands offers a yield of 5.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Smith & Wesson Brands pays out 55.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Smith & Wesson Brands quarterly revenues of $115.9M. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is higher than Smith & Wesson Brands's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.53x while Smith & Wesson Brands's PE ratio is 15.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.22x versus 0.94x for Smith & Wesson Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xylem has a net margin of 15.29% compared to Omega Flex's net margin of 8.17%. Omega Flex's return on equity of 21.23% beat Xylem's return on equity of 8.53%.

Omega Flex has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xylem has an analysts' consensus of $138.37 which suggests that it could grow by 9.93%. Given that Xylem has higher upside potential than Omega Flex, analysts believe Xylem is more attractive than Omega Flex.

Omega Flex has a beta of 0.363, which suggesting that the stock is 63.731% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xylem has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.635%.

Omega Flex has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.27%. Xylem offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Omega Flex pays 75.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Xylem pays out 39.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Omega Flex quarterly revenues are $23.3M, which are smaller than Xylem quarterly revenues of $2.1B. Omega Flex's net income of $3.6M is lower than Xylem's net income of $169M. Notably, Omega Flex's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.53x while Xylem's PE ratio is 34.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Omega Flex is 3.22x versus 3.62x for Xylem. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.