NTES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baidu has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of 22.74%. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat Baidu's return on equity of 7.86%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $113.35, signalling upside risk potential of 22.91%. On the other hand Baidu has an analysts' consensus of $110.43 which suggests that it could grow by 25.41%. Given that Baidu has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe Baidu is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baidu has a beta of 0.463, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.728%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Baidu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Baidu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Baidu quarterly revenues of $4.7B. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is lower than Baidu's net income of $1.1B. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while Baidu's PE ratio is 10.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.06x versus 1.66x for Baidu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZW Data Action Technologies has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of -59.09%. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat ZW Data Action Technologies's return on equity of -81.18%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $113.35, signalling upside risk potential of 22.91%. On the other hand ZW Data Action Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than ZW Data Action Technologies, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than ZW Data Action Technologies.

NetEase has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZW Data Action Technologies has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.653%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. ZW Data Action Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. ZW Data Action Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than ZW Data Action Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.2M. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is higher than ZW Data Action Technologies's net income of -$1.9M. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while ZW Data Action Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.06x versus 0.18x for ZW Data Action Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tencent Holdings has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of 31.84%. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat Tencent Holdings's return on equity of 26.75%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $113.35, signalling upside risk potential of 22.91%. On the other hand Tencent Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NetEase has higher upside potential than Tencent Holdings, analysts believe NetEase is more attractive than Tencent Holdings.

NetEase has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tencent Holdings has a beta of 0.185, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.525%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. Tencent Holdings offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Tencent Holdings pays out 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Tencent Holdings quarterly revenues of $23.4B. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is lower than Tencent Holdings's net income of $7.4B. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while Tencent Holdings's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.06x versus 5.88x for Tencent Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WiMi Hologram Cloud has a net margin of 24.95% compared to NetEase's net margin of --. NetEase's return on equity of 21.01% beat WiMi Hologram Cloud's return on equity of -44.29%.

NetEase has a consensus price target of $113.35, signalling upside risk potential of 22.91%. On the other hand WiMi Hologram Cloud has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 525%. Given that WiMi Hologram Cloud has higher upside potential than NetEase, analysts believe WiMi Hologram Cloud is more attractive than NetEase.

NetEase has a beta of 0.570, which suggesting that the stock is 42.972% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WiMi Hologram Cloud has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NetEase has a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.65%. WiMi Hologram Cloud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NetEase pays 27.24% of its earnings as a dividend. WiMi Hologram Cloud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetEase's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NetEase quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than WiMi Hologram Cloud quarterly revenues of --. NetEase's net income of $913.2M is higher than WiMi Hologram Cloud's net income of --. Notably, NetEase's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.61x while WiMi Hologram Cloud's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NetEase is 4.06x versus 1.23x for WiMi Hologram Cloud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.