NNE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of 0.21%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 102.94%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 148.02%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.678%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 13.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.26x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -161.83%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 102.94%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$4.7M is lower than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 3.58x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of 0.25%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 102.94%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 311.83%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Nano Nuclear Energy, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Nano Nuclear Energy.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$4.7M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 0.18x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NuScale Power has a net margin of -- compared to Nano Nuclear Energy's net margin of -3675.58%. Nano Nuclear Energy's return on equity of -- beat NuScale Power's return on equity of -64.73%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 102.94%. On the other hand NuScale Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.34%. Given that Nano Nuclear Energy has higher upside potential than NuScale Power, analysts believe Nano Nuclear Energy is more attractive than NuScale Power.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NuScale Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Nuclear Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NuScale Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Nuclear Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NuScale Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Nuclear Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NuScale Power quarterly revenues of $475K. Nano Nuclear Energy's net income of -$4.7M is higher than NuScale Power's net income of -$17.5M. Notably, Nano Nuclear Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NuScale Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Nuclear Energy is -- versus 242.79x for NuScale Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.