NNBR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Harte-Hanks has a net margin of -6.33% compared to NN's net margin of -0.94%. NN's return on equity of -25.03% beat Harte-Hanks's return on equity of -145.7%.

NN has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling upside risk potential of 194.57%. On the other hand Harte-Hanks has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 348.72%. Given that Harte-Hanks has higher upside potential than NN, analysts believe Harte-Hanks is more attractive than NN.

NN has a beta of 2.038, which suggesting that the stock is 103.838% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harte-Hanks has a beta of -0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.454%.

NN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harte-Hanks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harte-Hanks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NN quarterly revenues are $105.7M, which are larger than Harte-Hanks quarterly revenues of $41.6M. NN's net income of -$6.7M is lower than Harte-Hanks's net income of -$392K. Notably, NN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harte-Hanks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN is 0.23x versus 0.16x for Harte-Hanks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matthews International has a net margin of -6.33% compared to NN's net margin of -2.09%. NN's return on equity of -25.03% beat Matthews International's return on equity of -17.34%.

NN has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling upside risk potential of 194.57%. On the other hand Matthews International has an analysts' consensus of $38.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.53%. Given that NN has higher upside potential than Matthews International, analysts believe NN is more attractive than Matthews International.

NN has a beta of 2.038, which suggesting that the stock is 103.838% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matthews International has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.588%.

NN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Matthews International offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. NN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matthews International pays out -52.65% of its earnings as a dividend.

NN quarterly revenues are $105.7M, which are smaller than Matthews International quarterly revenues of $427.6M. NN's net income of -$6.7M is higher than Matthews International's net income of -$8.9M. Notably, NN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matthews International's PE ratio is 30.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN is 0.23x versus 0.45x for Matthews International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Planet Green Holdings has a net margin of -6.33% compared to NN's net margin of -70.61%. NN's return on equity of -25.03% beat Planet Green Holdings's return on equity of -80.05%.

NN has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling upside risk potential of 194.57%. On the other hand Planet Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NN has higher upside potential than Planet Green Holdings, analysts believe NN is more attractive than Planet Green Holdings.

NN has a beta of 2.038, which suggesting that the stock is 103.838% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Planet Green Holdings has a beta of 0.675, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.474%.

NN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Planet Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Planet Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NN quarterly revenues are $105.7M, which are larger than Planet Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.5M. NN's net income of -$6.7M is lower than Planet Green Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, NN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Planet Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN is 0.23x versus 3.21x for Planet Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seaboard has a net margin of -6.33% compared to NN's net margin of 1.38%. NN's return on equity of -25.03% beat Seaboard's return on equity of 2.09%.

NN has a consensus price target of $6.33, signalling upside risk potential of 194.57%. On the other hand Seaboard has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that NN has higher upside potential than Seaboard, analysts believe NN is more attractive than Seaboard.

NN has a beta of 2.038, which suggesting that the stock is 103.838% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seaboard has a beta of 0.151, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.949%.

NN has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seaboard offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share. NN pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard pays out 10.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Seaboard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

NN quarterly revenues are $105.7M, which are smaller than Seaboard quarterly revenues of $2.3B. NN's net income of -$6.7M is lower than Seaboard's net income of $32M. Notably, NN's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Seaboard's PE ratio is 28.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NN is 0.23x versus 0.31x for Seaboard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.