NMRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jones Lang LaSalle has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of 2.64%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43% beat Jones Lang LaSalle's return on equity of 7.41%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Jones Lang LaSalle has an analysts' consensus of $311.67 which suggests that it could grow by 22.66%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Jones Lang LaSalle, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Jones Lang LaSalle.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, which suggesting that the stock is 96.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jones Lang LaSalle has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.278%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Jones Lang LaSalle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group pays 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Jones Lang LaSalle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $685.9M, which are smaller than Jones Lang LaSalle quarterly revenues of $5.9B. Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M is lower than Jones Lang LaSalle's net income of $155.1M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.73x while Jones Lang LaSalle's PE ratio is 25.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 1.08x versus 0.55x for Jones Lang LaSalle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La Rosa Holdings has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of -12.52%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43% beat La Rosa Holdings's return on equity of -188.78%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand La Rosa Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than La Rosa Holdings, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than La Rosa Holdings.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, which suggesting that the stock is 96.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La Rosa Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. La Rosa Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Newmark Group pays 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. La Rosa Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $685.9M, which are larger than La Rosa Holdings quarterly revenues of $19.6M. Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M is higher than La Rosa Holdings's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.73x while La Rosa Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 1.08x versus 0.17x for La Rosa Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus & Millichap has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of -3.2%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43% beat Marcus & Millichap's return on equity of -4.92%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Marcus & Millichap has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could fall by -20.66%. Given that Newmark Group has higher upside potential than Marcus & Millichap, analysts believe Newmark Group is more attractive than Marcus & Millichap.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, which suggesting that the stock is 96.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus & Millichap has a beta of 1.151, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.093%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Marcus & Millichap offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Newmark Group pays 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus & Millichap pays out -59.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $685.9M, which are larger than Marcus & Millichap quarterly revenues of $168.5M. Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M is higher than Marcus & Millichap's net income of -$5.4M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.73x while Marcus & Millichap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 1.08x versus 2.34x for Marcus & Millichap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sachem Capital has a net margin of 2.59% compared to Newmark Group's net margin of -80.75%. Newmark Group's return on equity of 3.43% beat Sachem Capital's return on equity of -1.97%.

Newmark Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.28%. On the other hand Sachem Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 89.7%. Given that Sachem Capital has higher upside potential than Newmark Group, analysts believe Sachem Capital is more attractive than Newmark Group.

Newmark Group has a beta of 1.967, which suggesting that the stock is 96.717% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sachem Capital has a beta of 1.640, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.031%.

Newmark Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Sachem Capital offers a yield of 28.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Newmark Group pays 49.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Sachem Capital pays out 161.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Newmark Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Sachem Capital's is not.

Newmark Group quarterly revenues are $685.9M, which are larger than Sachem Capital quarterly revenues of $6.3M. Newmark Group's net income of $17.8M is higher than Sachem Capital's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Newmark Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.73x while Sachem Capital's PE ratio is 37.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Newmark Group is 1.08x versus 1.97x for Sachem Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.