Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Sell
5
NATO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.63
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$25.64 - $25.75
52-week range:
$24.88 - $28.05
Dividend yield:
0.08%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
490
Avg. volume:
1.8K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLNR
NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEA
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
|
$25.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 0.08% | -- |
|
CLNR
NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF
|
$22.86 | -- | -- | -- | $0.05 | 1.47% | -- |
|
SEA
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
|
$12.97 | -- | -- | -- | $2.40 | 18.5% | -- |
|
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
|
$26.63 | -- | -- | -- | $0.04 | 2.94% | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
$37.81 | -- | -- | -- | $1.30 | 4.76% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
CLNR
NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF
|
-- | 1.220 | -- | -- |
|
SEA
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
|
-- | 0.619 | -- | -- |
|
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
|
-- | 1.070 | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | 1.324 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NATO
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLNR
NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SEA
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SHPP
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUPL
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NATO or CLNR?
NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net margin of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's return on equity of -- beat NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- CLNRNYLI Cleaner Transport ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NATO or CLNR?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has higher upside potential than NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF, analysts believe Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is more attractive than NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF0 0 0 CLNRNYLI Cleaner Transport ETF0 0 0 -
Is NATO or CLNR More Risky?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NATO or CLNR?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NATO or CLNR?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net income of -- is lower than NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is -- versus -- for NYLI Cleaner Transport ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- -- CLNRNYLI Cleaner Transport ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NATO or SEA?
US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net margin of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's return on equity of -- beat US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- SEAUS Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NATO or SEA?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has higher upside potential than US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF, analysts believe Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is more attractive than US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF0 0 0 SEAUS Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF0 0 0 -
Is NATO or SEA More Risky?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NATO or SEA?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF offers a yield of 18.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NATO or SEA?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net income of -- is lower than US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is -- versus -- for US Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- -- SEAUS Global Sea to Sky Cargo ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NATO or SHPP?
Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net margin of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's return on equity of -- beat Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- SHPPPacer Industrials and Logistics ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NATO or SHPP?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has higher upside potential than Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF, analysts believe Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is more attractive than Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF0 0 0 SHPPPacer Industrials and Logistics ETF0 0 0 -
Is NATO or SHPP More Risky?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NATO or SHPP?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NATO or SHPP?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net income of -- is lower than Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is -- versus -- for Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- -- SHPPPacer Industrials and Logistics ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NATO or SUPL?
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net margin of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's return on equity of -- beat ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NATO or SUPL?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has higher upside potential than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF, analysts believe Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is more attractive than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF0 0 0 SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF0 0 0 -
Is NATO or SUPL More Risky?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NATO or SUPL?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.08%. ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NATO or SUPL?
Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF quarterly revenues of --. Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's net income of -- is lower than ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's net income of --. Notably, Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Themes Transatlantic Defense ETF is -- versus -- for ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NATOThemes Transatlantic Defense ETF-- -- -- -- SUPLProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Is Tesla Going to Buy Uber?
Tesla has always been in the habit of making large,…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
