MGIH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NFT has a net margin of -- compared to Millennium Group International Holdings's net margin of --. Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75% beat NFT's return on equity of --.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Millennium Group International Holdings has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Millennium Group International Holdings is more attractive than NFT.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 2.834, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 183.369%.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Millennium Group International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Millennium Group International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NFT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Millennium Group International Holdings is 0.45x versus -- for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -- compared to Millennium Group International Holdings's net margin of 2.32%. Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $9.49 which suggests that it could grow by 55.52%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Millennium Group International Holdings, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Millennium Group International Holdings.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 1.048, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.817%.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Millennium Group International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out -0.1% of its earnings as a dividend.

Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $27.3M. Notably, Millennium Group International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Millennium Group International Holdings is 0.45x versus 0.58x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -- compared to Millennium Group International Holdings's net margin of 0.33%. Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.92%.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 607.55%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Millennium Group International Holdings, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Millennium Group International Holdings.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.901, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.913%.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 18.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Millennium Group International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1622.36% of its earnings as a dividend.

Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Natural Health Trends's net income of $35K. Notably, Millennium Group International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 58.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Millennium Group International Holdings is 0.45x versus 1.13x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of -- compared to Millennium Group International Holdings's net margin of --. Millennium Group International Holdings's return on equity of -23.75% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Millennium Group International Holdings has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Millennium Group International Holdings is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Millennium Group International Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Millennium Group International Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Millennium Group International Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Millennium Group International Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Millennium Group International Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Millennium Group International Holdings is 0.45x versus 5.60x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.