KPLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Data Storage has a net margin of -7.91% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of 0.3%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Data Storage's return on equity of 0.92%.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.44%. On the other hand Data Storage has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 168.66%. Given that Data Storage has higher upside potential than Katapult Holdings, analysts believe Data Storage is more attractive than Katapult Holdings.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.155% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Data Storage has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.649%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Data Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Data Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.9M, which are larger than Data Storage quarterly revenues of $8.1M. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$5.7M is lower than Data Storage's net income of $24.1K. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Data Storage's PE ratio is 167.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.97x for Data Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of -7.91% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of -17.13%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.44%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $16.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.11%. Given that Intellinetics has higher upside potential than Katapult Holdings, analysts believe Intellinetics is more attractive than Katapult Holdings.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.155% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.525, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.506%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.9M, which are larger than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$5.7M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.14x versus 3.16x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -7.91% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of -568.22%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.44%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Katapult Holdings has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Katapult Holdings is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.155% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.9M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$5.7M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.14x versus 1.76x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -7.91% compared to Katapult Holdings's net margin of -2.12%. Katapult Holdings's return on equity of -- beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Katapult Holdings has a consensus price target of $8.00, signalling downside risk potential of -2.44%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 145.1%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Katapult Holdings, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Katapult Holdings.

Katapult Holdings has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.155% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.32%.

Katapult Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Katapult Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Katapult Holdings quarterly revenues are $71.9M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Katapult Holdings's net income of -$5.7M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Katapult Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Katapult Holdings is 0.14x versus 0.20x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.