Financhill
Buy
58

KINS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$16.30
Seasonality move :
8.37%
Day range:
$15.85 - $16.39
52-week range:
$4.55 - $22.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
10.07x
P/S ratio:
1.22x
P/B ratio:
2.73x
Volume:
270.1K
Avg. volume:
433.4K
1-year change:
223.43%
Market cap:
$224.2M
Revenue:
$155.1M
EPS (TTM):
$1.59

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
KINS
Kingstone Companies
$41.7M -- 22.19% 48.65% $22.00
BWIN
The Baldwin Insurance Group
$417.6M $0.65 10.83% 96.31% $46.50
CRVL
CorVel
-- -- -- -- --
EHTH
eHealth
$99.5M -$0.43 -30.18% -6.02% $10.00
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
$78.1M $0.22 20.61% 109.18% $116.11
RELI
Reliance Global Group
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
KINS
Kingstone Companies
$16.01 $22.00 $224.2M 10.07x $0.00 0% 1.22x
BWIN
The Baldwin Insurance Group
$38.49 $46.50 $2.7B -- $0.00 0% 1.79x
CRVL
CorVel
$110.73 -- $5.7B 60.29x $0.00 0% 6.43x
EHTH
eHealth
$4.35 $10.00 $131.9M -- $0.00 0% 0.23x
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
$108.48 $116.11 $2.7B 91.16x $5.91 0% 11.69x
RELI
Reliance Global Group
$1.20 -- $3.6M -- $0.00 0% 0.14x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
KINS
Kingstone Companies
6.13% 3.110 2.34% 28.29x
BWIN
The Baldwin Insurance Group
71.45% 1.804 43.68% 0.88x
CRVL
CorVel
-- 1.668 -- 1.35x
EHTH
eHealth
6.89% 0.645 12.54% 2.49x
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
143.24% 1.270 10.11% 0.47x
RELI
Reliance Global Group
81.9% -3.220 334.49% 0.36x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
KINS
Kingstone Companies
-- -- 28.17% 36.5% 9.79% $17M
BWIN
The Baldwin Insurance Group
$144.7M $64.1M -1.23% -3.09% 15.69% -$72.9M
CRVL
CorVel
$58.2M $33.3M 33.58% 33.58% 14.39% $14.3M
EHTH
eHealth
$313.9M $4.8M 3.8% 4.17% 5.64% $73.7M
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
-- -- 27.79% 228.38% 8.97% $12.1M
RELI
Reliance Global Group
$537K -$1.4M -35.89% -205.56% -33.32% $182.9K

Kingstone Companies vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns KINS or BWIN?

    The Baldwin Insurance Group has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 3.41%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat The Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity of -3.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    -- $0.27 $87.6M
    BWIN
    The Baldwin Insurance Group
    35.42% $0.20 $2.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About KINS or BWIN?

    Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.41%. On the other hand The Baldwin Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $46.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.81%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than The Baldwin Insurance Group, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than The Baldwin Insurance Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1 0 0
    BWIN
    The Baldwin Insurance Group
    3 2 1
  • Is KINS or BWIN More Risky?

    Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.62%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KINS or BWIN?

    Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Baldwin Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Baldwin Insurance Group pays out -1.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KINS or BWIN?

    Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than The Baldwin Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $408.5M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is lower than The Baldwin Insurance Group's net income of $13.9M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while The Baldwin Insurance Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.22x versus 1.79x for The Baldwin Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1.22x 10.07x $50.5M $3.9M
    BWIN
    The Baldwin Insurance Group
    1.79x -- $408.5M $13.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns KINS or CRVL?

    CorVel has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 11.41%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat CorVel's return on equity of 33.58%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    -- $0.27 $87.6M
    CRVL
    CorVel
    25.13% $0.51 $322M
  • What do Analysts Say About KINS or CRVL?

    Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.41%. On the other hand CorVel has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than CorVel, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than CorVel.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1 0 0
    CRVL
    CorVel
    0 0 0
  • Is KINS or CRVL More Risky?

    Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CorVel has a beta of 1.102, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.208%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KINS or CRVL?

    Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CorVel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CorVel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KINS or CRVL?

    Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than CorVel quarterly revenues of $231.5M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is lower than CorVel's net income of $26.4M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while CorVel's PE ratio is 60.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.22x versus 6.43x for CorVel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1.22x 10.07x $50.5M $3.9M
    CRVL
    CorVel
    6.43x 60.29x $231.5M $26.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns KINS or EHTH?

    eHealth has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 1.72%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat eHealth's return on equity of 4.17%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    -- $0.27 $87.6M
    EHTH
    eHealth
    99.6% -$0.33 $998.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About KINS or EHTH?

    Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.41%. On the other hand eHealth has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 129.89%. Given that eHealth has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe eHealth is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1 0 0
    EHTH
    eHealth
    1 4 0
  • Is KINS or EHTH More Risky?

    Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eHealth has a beta of 1.113, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.29%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KINS or EHTH?

    Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eHealth offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth pays out 55.3% of its earnings as a dividend. eHealth's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KINS or EHTH?

    Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than eHealth quarterly revenues of $113.1M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is higher than eHealth's net income of $2M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while eHealth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.22x versus 0.23x for eHealth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1.22x 10.07x $50.5M $3.9M
    EHTH
    eHealth
    0.23x -- $113.1M $2M
  • Which has Higher Returns KINS or GSHD?

    Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of 3.1%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 228.38%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    -- $0.27 $87.6M
    GSHD
    Goosehead Insurance
    -- $0.09 $147.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About KINS or GSHD?

    Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.41%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $116.11 which suggests that it could grow by 7.04%. Given that Kingstone Companies has higher upside potential than Goosehead Insurance, analysts believe Kingstone Companies is more attractive than Goosehead Insurance.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1 0 0
    GSHD
    Goosehead Insurance
    1 5 0
  • Is KINS or GSHD More Risky?

    Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.901%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KINS or GSHD?

    Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.91 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KINS or GSHD?

    Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are smaller than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is higher than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $2.3M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 91.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.22x versus 11.69x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1.22x 10.07x $50.5M $3.9M
    GSHD
    Goosehead Insurance
    11.69x 91.16x $75.6M $2.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns KINS or RELI?

    Reliance Global Group has a net margin of 7.69% compared to Kingstone Companies's net margin of -41%. Kingstone Companies's return on equity of 36.5% beat Reliance Global Group's return on equity of -205.56%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    -- $0.27 $87.6M
    RELI
    Reliance Global Group
    12.68% -$0.66 $14.5M
  • What do Analysts Say About KINS or RELI?

    Kingstone Companies has a consensus price target of $22.00, signalling upside risk potential of 37.41%. On the other hand Reliance Global Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 9858.16%. Given that Reliance Global Group has higher upside potential than Kingstone Companies, analysts believe Reliance Global Group is more attractive than Kingstone Companies.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1 0 0
    RELI
    Reliance Global Group
    0 0 0
  • Is KINS or RELI More Risky?

    Kingstone Companies has a beta of 0.605, which suggesting that the stock is 39.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reliance Global Group has a beta of -0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 160.923%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KINS or RELI?

    Kingstone Companies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reliance Global Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kingstone Companies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reliance Global Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KINS or RELI?

    Kingstone Companies quarterly revenues are $50.5M, which are larger than Reliance Global Group quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Kingstone Companies's net income of $3.9M is higher than Reliance Global Group's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Kingstone Companies's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.07x while Reliance Global Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kingstone Companies is 1.22x versus 0.14x for Reliance Global Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KINS
    Kingstone Companies
    1.22x 10.07x $50.5M $3.9M
    RELI
    Reliance Global Group
    0.14x -- $4.2M -$1.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Dell Stock Be in 5 Years?

So you’re looking at Dell (NASDAQ: DELL) and wondering, “Is…

Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?
Where Will Cameco Stock Be in 5 Years?

Cameco (NYSE: CCJ) isn’t exactly the kind of stock you…

Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth
Microsoft Stock Outlook, Azure & AI as Drivers of Long-Term Growth

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has been among the top growth stocks of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
67
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Buy
70
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 47x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
84
SBET alert for May 30

SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 3.17% over the past day.

Buy
55
RGC alert for May 30

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 16.13% over the past day.

Buy
73
CTEV alert for May 30

Claritev [CTEV] is up 7.82% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock