INTZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Data Storage has a net margin of -118.2% compared to Intrusion's net margin of 0.3%. Intrusion's return on equity of -170.26% beat Data Storage's return on equity of 0.92%.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 288.51%. On the other hand Data Storage has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 140.64%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Data Storage, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Data Storage.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 233.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Data Storage has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.975%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Data Storage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Data Storage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Data Storage quarterly revenues of $8.1M. Intrusion's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Data Storage's net income of $24.1K. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Data Storage's PE ratio is 187.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 2.64x versus 1.09x for Data Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intellinetics has a net margin of -118.2% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -17.13%. Intrusion's return on equity of -170.26% beat Intellinetics's return on equity of -10.61%.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 288.51%. On the other hand Intellinetics has an analysts' consensus of $17.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.29%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Intellinetics, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Intellinetics.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 233.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intellinetics has a beta of 0.548, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.204%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intellinetics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intellinetics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Intellinetics quarterly revenues of $4.2M. Intrusion's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Intellinetics's net income of -$727.6K. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intellinetics's PE ratio is 248.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 2.64x versus 3.15x for Intellinetics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of -118.2% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -568.22%. Intrusion's return on equity of -170.26% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 288.51%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 233.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. Intrusion's net income of -$2.1M is lower than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 2.64x versus 1.06x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of -118.2% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -2.12%. Intrusion's return on equity of -170.26% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 288.51%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 148.34%. Given that Intrusion has higher upside potential than WidePoint, analysts believe Intrusion is more attractive than WidePoint.

Intrusion has a beta of -1.330, which suggesting that the stock is 233.03% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.805, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.475%.

Intrusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intrusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intrusion quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Intrusion's net income of -$2.1M is lower than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Intrusion's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intrusion is 2.64x versus 0.20x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.