IMMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Immuron has a net margin of -- compared to Immutep's net margin of --. Immutep's return on equity of -- beat Immuron's return on equity of -40.9%.

Immutep has a consensus price target of $8.43, signalling upside risk potential of 387.18%. On the other hand Immuron has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 157.76%. Given that Immutep has higher upside potential than Immuron, analysts believe Immutep is more attractive than Immuron.

Immutep has a beta of 2.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Immuron has a beta of 1.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.224%.

Immutep has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Immuron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immutep pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Immuron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Immutep quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Immuron quarterly revenues of --. Immutep's net income of -- is lower than Immuron's net income of --. Notably, Immutep's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Immuron's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immutep is -- versus 3.44x for Immuron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kazia Therapeutics has a net margin of -- compared to Immutep's net margin of --. Immutep's return on equity of -- beat Kazia Therapeutics's return on equity of -1083.16%.

Immutep has a consensus price target of $8.43, signalling upside risk potential of 387.18%. On the other hand Kazia Therapeutics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 586.69%. Given that Kazia Therapeutics has higher upside potential than Immutep, analysts believe Kazia Therapeutics is more attractive than Immutep.

Immutep has a beta of 2.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kazia Therapeutics has a beta of 1.977, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.738%.

Immutep has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kazia Therapeutics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immutep pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kazia Therapeutics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Immutep quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kazia Therapeutics quarterly revenues of --. Immutep's net income of -- is lower than Kazia Therapeutics's net income of --. Notably, Immutep's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kazia Therapeutics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immutep is -- versus -- for Kazia Therapeutics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mesoblast has a net margin of -- compared to Immutep's net margin of --. Immutep's return on equity of -- beat Mesoblast's return on equity of --.

Immutep has a consensus price target of $8.43, signalling upside risk potential of 387.18%. On the other hand Mesoblast has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 32.2%. Given that Immutep has higher upside potential than Mesoblast, analysts believe Immutep is more attractive than Mesoblast.

Immutep has a beta of 2.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mesoblast has a beta of 3.540, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 253.97%.

Immutep has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mesoblast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immutep pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mesoblast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Immutep quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Mesoblast quarterly revenues of --. Immutep's net income of -- is lower than Mesoblast's net income of --. Notably, Immutep's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mesoblast's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immutep is -- versus 176.48x for Mesoblast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opthea has a net margin of -- compared to Immutep's net margin of --. Immutep's return on equity of -- beat Opthea's return on equity of --.

Immutep has a consensus price target of $8.43, signalling upside risk potential of 387.18%. On the other hand Opthea has an analysts' consensus of $12.17 which suggests that it could grow by 235.17%. Given that Immutep has higher upside potential than Opthea, analysts believe Immutep is more attractive than Opthea.

Immutep has a beta of 2.221, which suggesting that the stock is 122.066% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opthea has a beta of 0.742, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.8%.

Immutep has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Opthea offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Immutep pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Opthea pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Immutep quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Opthea quarterly revenues of --. Immutep's net income of -- is lower than Opthea's net income of --. Notably, Immutep's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Opthea's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Immutep is -- versus 2,322.88x for Opthea. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.