ICFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

FTI Consulting has a net margin of 6.32% compared to ICF International's net margin of 7.18%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.6% beat FTI Consulting's return on equity of 15.14%.

ICF International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.5%. On the other hand FTI Consulting has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than FTI Consulting, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than FTI Consulting.

ICF International has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FTI Consulting has a beta of 0.125, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.548%.

ICF International has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. FTI Consulting offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ICF International pays 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. FTI Consulting pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ICF International quarterly revenues are $517M, which are smaller than FTI Consulting quarterly revenues of $926M. ICF International's net income of $32.7M is lower than FTI Consulting's net income of $66.5M. Notably, ICF International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while FTI Consulting's PE ratio is 22.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ICF International is 1.11x versus 1.87x for FTI Consulting. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huron Consulting Group has a net margin of 6.32% compared to ICF International's net margin of 7.18%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.6% beat Huron Consulting Group's return on equity of 16.4%.

ICF International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.5%. On the other hand Huron Consulting Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than Huron Consulting Group, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than Huron Consulting Group.

ICF International has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huron Consulting Group has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.553%.

ICF International has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Huron Consulting Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ICF International pays 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Huron Consulting Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ICF International quarterly revenues are $517M, which are larger than Huron Consulting Group quarterly revenues of $378.1M. ICF International's net income of $32.7M is higher than Huron Consulting Group's net income of $27.1M. Notably, ICF International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while Huron Consulting Group's PE ratio is 26.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ICF International is 1.11x versus 1.57x for Huron Consulting Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Initio has a net margin of 6.32% compared to ICF International's net margin of --. ICF International's return on equity of 11.6% beat Initio's return on equity of --.

ICF International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.5%. On the other hand Initio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that ICF International has higher upside potential than Initio, analysts believe ICF International is more attractive than Initio.

ICF International has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Initio has a beta of -0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 106.339%.

ICF International has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Initio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ICF International pays 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Initio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ICF International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ICF International quarterly revenues are $517M, which are larger than Initio quarterly revenues of --. ICF International's net income of $32.7M is higher than Initio's net income of --. Notably, ICF International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while Initio's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ICF International is 1.11x versus -- for Initio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Maximus has a net margin of 6.32% compared to ICF International's net margin of 5.51%. ICF International's return on equity of 11.6% beat Maximus's return on equity of 17.37%.

ICF International has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 53.5%. On the other hand Maximus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.23%. Given that Maximus has higher upside potential than ICF International, analysts believe Maximus is more attractive than ICF International.

ICF International has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.825% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Maximus has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.015%.

ICF International has a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Maximus offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. ICF International pays 12.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Maximus pays out 23.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ICF International quarterly revenues are $517M, which are smaller than Maximus quarterly revenues of $1.3B. ICF International's net income of $32.7M is lower than Maximus's net income of $72.5M. Notably, ICF International's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.67x while Maximus's PE ratio is 14.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ICF International is 1.11x versus 0.85x for Maximus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.