IBKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 23.55%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.77% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 7.61%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.48%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $45.24 which suggests that it could grow by 14.29%. Given that Robinhood Markets has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Robinhood Markets is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 7% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $637M. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $184M is higher than Robinhood Markets's net income of $150M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 67.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.18x versus 14.59x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 22.23%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.77% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 11.05%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.48%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $127.69 which suggests that it could grow by 0.5%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.389%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 7% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 63.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $184M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.2B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 19.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.18x versus 3.76x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of -182.06%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.77% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.48%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 53.39%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 7% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $184M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 58.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.18x versus 9.39x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 29.05%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.77% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 12.12%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $195.80, signalling upside risk potential of 8.48%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $83.90 which suggests that it could grow by 12.11%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 0.846, which suggesting that the stock is 15.42% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.963, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.689%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.39%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 7% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 44.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $184M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.16x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 29.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.18x versus 7.32x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.