IBKR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 3.23%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 15.99%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $61.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $304.69 which suggests that it could fall by -21.48%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Coinbase Global, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Coinbase Global.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $2B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is higher than Coinbase Global's net income of $65.6M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.90x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 72.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.77x versus 15.08x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Robinhood Markets has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 36.25%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Robinhood Markets's return on equity of 21.41%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $61.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Robinhood Markets has an analysts' consensus of $95.57 which suggests that it could fall by -3.99%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Robinhood Markets, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Robinhood Markets.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Robinhood Markets has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Robinhood Markets offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Robinhood Markets pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interactive Brokers Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are larger than Robinhood Markets quarterly revenues of $927M. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Robinhood Markets's net income of $336M. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.90x while Robinhood Markets's PE ratio is 56.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.77x versus 28.11x for Robinhood Markets. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 26.13%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $61.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $138.13 which suggests that it could fall by -2.44%. Given that Interactive Brokers Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe Interactive Brokers Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.299, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.914%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.90x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 16.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.77x versus 3.80x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Interactive Brokers Group's net margin of 34.1%. Interactive Brokers Group's return on equity of 4.96% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 14.02%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a consensus price target of $61.89, signalling upside risk potential of 3.79%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $100.53 which suggests that it could grow by 9.73%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than Interactive Brokers Group, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than Interactive Brokers Group.

Interactive Brokers Group has a beta of 1.247, which suggesting that the stock is 24.677% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.935, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.506%.

Interactive Brokers Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.45%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Interactive Brokers Group pays 12.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interactive Brokers Group quarterly revenues are $2.3B, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Interactive Brokers Group's net income of $213M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Interactive Brokers Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.90x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 27.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interactive Brokers Group is 2.77x versus 8.20x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.