GNLN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alico has a net margin of -263.24% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -619.49%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -165.82% beat Alico's return on equity of -59.17%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2002377.05%. On the other hand Alico has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.37%. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Alico, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Alico.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.585, which suggesting that the stock is 58.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alico has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.384%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alico offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alico pays out 21.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Alico's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Alico quarterly revenues of $18M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.9M is higher than Alico's net income of -$111.4M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alico's PE ratio is 32.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.30x versus 5.07x for Alico. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Local Bounti has a net margin of -263.24% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -324.65%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -165.82% beat Local Bounti's return on equity of -466.66%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2002377.05%. On the other hand Local Bounti has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 198.81%. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Local Bounti, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Local Bounti.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.585, which suggesting that the stock is 58.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Local Bounti has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Local Bounti offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Local Bounti pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Local Bounti quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.9M is higher than Local Bounti's net income of -$37.7M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Local Bounti's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.30x versus 0.52x for Local Bounti. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pioneer Green Farms has a net margin of -263.24% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -3784581.4%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -165.82% beat Pioneer Green Farms's return on equity of --.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2002377.05%. On the other hand Pioneer Green Farms has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Greenlane Holdings has higher upside potential than Pioneer Green Farms, analysts believe Greenlane Holdings is more attractive than Pioneer Green Farms.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.585, which suggesting that the stock is 58.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pioneer Green Farms has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pioneer Green Farms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pioneer Green Farms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are larger than Pioneer Green Farms quarterly revenues of $40. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Pioneer Green Farms's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pioneer Green Farms's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.30x versus 238.20x for Pioneer Green Farms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

22nd Century Group has a net margin of -263.24% compared to Greenlane Holdings's net margin of -190.24%. Greenlane Holdings's return on equity of -165.82% beat 22nd Century Group's return on equity of -832.63%.

Greenlane Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2002377.05%. On the other hand 22nd Century Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 4019317.88%. Given that 22nd Century Group has higher upside potential than Greenlane Holdings, analysts believe 22nd Century Group is more attractive than Greenlane Holdings.

Greenlane Holdings has a beta of 1.585, which suggesting that the stock is 58.537% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison 22nd Century Group has a beta of 1.785, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.47%.

Greenlane Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. 22nd Century Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenlane Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. 22nd Century Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenlane Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than 22nd Century Group quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Greenlane Holdings's net income of -$3.9M is higher than 22nd Century Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Greenlane Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while 22nd Century Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenlane Holdings is 0.30x versus 0.02x for 22nd Century Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.