GLTO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evaxion AS has a net margin of -- compared to Galecto's net margin of -64.14%. Galecto's return on equity of -- beat Evaxion AS's return on equity of --.

Galecto has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Evaxion AS has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 338.74%. Given that Evaxion AS has higher upside potential than Galecto, analysts believe Evaxion AS is more attractive than Galecto.

Galecto has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evaxion AS has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Galecto has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evaxion AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galecto pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evaxion AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Galecto quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evaxion AS quarterly revenues of $3M. Galecto's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Evaxion AS's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Galecto's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evaxion AS's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galecto is -- versus 2.00x for Evaxion AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genmab AS has a net margin of -- compared to Galecto's net margin of 27.27%. Galecto's return on equity of -- beat Genmab AS's return on equity of 22.23%.

Galecto has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Genmab AS has an analysts' consensus of $29.69 which suggests that it could grow by 29.98%. Given that Galecto has higher upside potential than Genmab AS, analysts believe Galecto is more attractive than Genmab AS.

Galecto has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genmab AS has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.415%.

Galecto has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genmab AS offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galecto pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genmab AS pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Galecto quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Genmab AS quarterly revenues of $715M. Galecto's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Genmab AS's net income of $195M. Notably, Galecto's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Genmab AS's PE ratio is 13.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galecto is -- versus 4.79x for Genmab AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IO Biotech has a net margin of -- compared to Galecto's net margin of --. Galecto's return on equity of -- beat IO Biotech's return on equity of --.

Galecto has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand IO Biotech has an analysts' consensus of $9.50 which suggests that it could grow by 541.89%. Given that IO Biotech has higher upside potential than Galecto, analysts believe IO Biotech is more attractive than Galecto.

Galecto has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IO Biotech has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Galecto has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IO Biotech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galecto pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IO Biotech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Galecto quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IO Biotech quarterly revenues of --. Galecto's net income of -$2.5M is higher than IO Biotech's net income of -$22.4M. Notably, Galecto's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IO Biotech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galecto is -- versus -- for IO Biotech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Novo Nordisk AS has a net margin of -- compared to Galecto's net margin of 37.18%. Galecto's return on equity of -- beat Novo Nordisk AS's return on equity of 84.88%.

Galecto has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 78.57%. On the other hand Novo Nordisk AS has an analysts' consensus of $91.53 which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that Galecto has higher upside potential than Novo Nordisk AS, analysts believe Galecto is more attractive than Novo Nordisk AS.

Galecto has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Novo Nordisk AS has a beta of 0.662, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.759%.

Galecto has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Novo Nordisk AS offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.14 per share. Galecto pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS pays out 43.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Novo Nordisk AS's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Galecto quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Novo Nordisk AS quarterly revenues of $11B. Galecto's net income of -$2.5M is lower than Novo Nordisk AS's net income of $4.1B. Notably, Galecto's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Novo Nordisk AS's PE ratio is 23.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galecto is -- versus 8.11x for Novo Nordisk AS. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.