FTHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Forestar Group has a net margin of -9.7% compared to Fathom Holdings's net margin of 14.8%. Fathom Holdings's return on equity of -45.17% beat Forestar Group's return on equity of 13.83%.

Fathom Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.68%. On the other hand Forestar Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 51.78%. Given that Fathom Holdings has higher upside potential than Forestar Group, analysts believe Fathom Holdings is more attractive than Forestar Group.

Fathom Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forestar Group has a beta of 1.716, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.566%.

Fathom Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forestar Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fathom Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forestar Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are smaller than Forestar Group quarterly revenues of $551.4M. Fathom Holdings's net income of -$8.1M is lower than Forestar Group's net income of $81.6M. Notably, Fathom Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forestar Group's PE ratio is 6.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.88x for Forestar Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GiveMePower has a net margin of -9.7% compared to Fathom Holdings's net margin of --. Fathom Holdings's return on equity of -45.17% beat GiveMePower's return on equity of --.

Fathom Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.68%. On the other hand GiveMePower has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fathom Holdings has higher upside potential than GiveMePower, analysts believe Fathom Holdings is more attractive than GiveMePower.

Fathom Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GiveMePower has a beta of -1.536, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 253.595%.

Fathom Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GiveMePower offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fathom Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GiveMePower pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are larger than GiveMePower quarterly revenues of --. Fathom Holdings's net income of -$8.1M is lower than GiveMePower's net income of -$8.9K. Notably, Fathom Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GiveMePower's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings is 0.09x versus -- for GiveMePower. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Granite Point Mortgage Trust has a net margin of -9.7% compared to Fathom Holdings's net margin of -302.59%. Fathom Holdings's return on equity of -45.17% beat Granite Point Mortgage Trust's return on equity of -23.31%.

Fathom Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.68%. On the other hand Granite Point Mortgage Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25%. Given that Fathom Holdings has higher upside potential than Granite Point Mortgage Trust, analysts believe Fathom Holdings is more attractive than Granite Point Mortgage Trust.

Fathom Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Point Mortgage Trust has a beta of 1.829, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.852%.

Fathom Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Point Mortgage Trust offers a yield of 15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Fathom Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Point Mortgage Trust pays out -90.74% of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are larger than Granite Point Mortgage Trust quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Fathom Holdings's net income of -$8.1M is higher than Granite Point Mortgage Trust's net income of -$31M. Notably, Fathom Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Granite Point Mortgage Trust's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings is 0.09x versus 3.20x for Granite Point Mortgage Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Anywhere Real Estate has a net margin of -9.7% compared to Fathom Holdings's net margin of 0.46%. Fathom Holdings's return on equity of -45.17% beat Anywhere Real Estate's return on equity of -10.32%.

Fathom Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 109.68%. On the other hand Anywhere Real Estate has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.35%. Given that Fathom Holdings has higher upside potential than Anywhere Real Estate, analysts believe Fathom Holdings is more attractive than Anywhere Real Estate.

Fathom Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Anywhere Real Estate has a beta of 2.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 131.593%.

Fathom Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Anywhere Real Estate offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fathom Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Anywhere Real Estate pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Fathom Holdings quarterly revenues are $83.7M, which are smaller than Anywhere Real Estate quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Fathom Holdings's net income of -$8.1M is lower than Anywhere Real Estate's net income of $7M. Notably, Fathom Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Anywhere Real Estate's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fathom Holdings is 0.09x versus 0.07x for Anywhere Real Estate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.