Financhill
Buy
55

DRVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$17.24
Seasonality move :
-11.53%
Day range:
$17.49 - $17.76
52-week range:
$12.66 - $18.72
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
391.00x
P/S ratio:
1.25x
P/B ratio:
4.53x
Volume:
593.5K
Avg. volume:
716.1K
1-year change:
36.18%
Market cap:
$2.9B
Revenue:
$2.3B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.81

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
$540.1M $0.33 -11.8% 86.21% $21.31
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
-- -- -- -- --
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
-- -- -- -- --
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
$100.6M -$0.06 -12.18% -62.43% $1.15
MCW
Mister Car Wash
$271.8M $0.13 6.64% 78.7% $9.38
VVV
Valvoline
$436.7M $0.45 3.76% 30.08% $42.23
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
$17.73 $21.31 $2.9B 391.00x $0.00 0% 1.25x
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
$4.05 -- $16M -- $0.00 0% --
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
$0.45 -- $1.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.06x
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
$0.64 $1.15 $296M -- $0.00 0% 0.70x
MCW
Mister Car Wash
$6.59 $9.38 $2.1B 26.36x $0.00 0% 2.14x
VVV
Valvoline
$38.00 $42.23 $4.8B 18.45x $0.00 0% 2.94x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
80.46% 0.851 94.06% 0.80x
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
-- 0.276 -- --
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
-- 1.345 -- --
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
72.19% 1.563 107.07% 0.97x
MCW
Mister Car Wash
45.23% 0.315 33.32% 0.26x
VVV
Valvoline
81.22% 0.780 24.31% 0.47x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings
$297.8M $61.3M -8.09% -35.84% 11.83% $18.9M
BWTL
Bowlin Travel Centers
-- -- -- -- -- --
CDTI
CDTi Advanced Materials
-- -- -- -- -- --
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings
$28M -$53.8M -54.2% -138.7% -51.27% -$34M
MCW
Mister Car Wash
$187.4M $53.1M 4.27% 8.24% 20.24% $32.5M
VVV
Valvoline
$150.5M $67.7M 19.78% 160.95% 16.82% -$4.6M

Driven Brands Holdings vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns DRVN or BWTL?

    Bowlin Travel Centers has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Bowlin Travel Centers's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    57.7% $0.04 $3.3B
    BWTL
    Bowlin Travel Centers
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About DRVN or BWTL?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Bowlin Travel Centers has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Driven Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Bowlin Travel Centers, analysts believe Driven Brands Holdings is more attractive than Bowlin Travel Centers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    6 5 0
    BWTL
    Bowlin Travel Centers
    0 0 0
  • Is DRVN or BWTL More Risky?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bowlin Travel Centers has a beta of -0.181, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.053%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DRVN or BWTL?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bowlin Travel Centers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bowlin Travel Centers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DRVN or BWTL?

    Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than Bowlin Travel Centers quarterly revenues of --. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than Bowlin Travel Centers's net income of --. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Bowlin Travel Centers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus -- for Bowlin Travel Centers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    1.25x 391.00x $516.2M $5.5M
    BWTL
    Bowlin Travel Centers
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns DRVN or CDTI?

    CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    57.7% $0.04 $3.3B
    CDTI
    CDTi Advanced Materials
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About DRVN or CDTI?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 853.77%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    6 5 0
    CDTI
    CDTi Advanced Materials
    0 0 0
  • Is DRVN or CDTI More Risky?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.441, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 144.114%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DRVN or CDTI?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DRVN or CDTI?

    Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 0.06x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    1.25x 391.00x $516.2M $5.5M
    CDTI
    CDTi Advanced Materials
    0.06x -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns DRVN or CHPT?

    ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of -58.5%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -138.7%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    57.7% $0.04 $3.3B
    CHPT
    ChargePoint Holdings
    28.66% -$0.12 $426.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About DRVN or CHPT?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.15 which suggests that it could grow by 78.64%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    6 5 0
    CHPT
    ChargePoint Holdings
    1 12 0
  • Is DRVN or CHPT More Risky?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.228, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.826%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DRVN or CHPT?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DRVN or CHPT?

    Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $97.6M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is higher than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$57.1M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 0.70x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    1.25x 391.00x $516.2M $5.5M
    CHPT
    ChargePoint Holdings
    0.70x -- $97.6M -$57.1M
  • Which has Higher Returns DRVN or MCW?

    Mister Car Wash has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 10.32%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 8.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    57.7% $0.04 $3.3B
    MCW
    Mister Car Wash
    71.62% $0.08 $1.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About DRVN or MCW?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.38 which suggests that it could grow by 42.26%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    6 5 0
    MCW
    Mister Car Wash
    9 5 0
  • Is DRVN or MCW More Risky?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DRVN or MCW?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DRVN or MCW?

    Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $261.7M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $27M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 26.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 2.14x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    1.25x 391.00x $516.2M $5.5M
    MCW
    Mister Car Wash
    2.14x 26.36x $261.7M $27M
  • Which has Higher Returns DRVN or VVV?

    Valvoline has a net margin of 1.07% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 9.33%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -35.84% beat Valvoline's return on equity of 160.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    57.7% $0.04 $3.3B
    VVV
    Valvoline
    37.33% $0.29 $1.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About DRVN or VVV?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $21.31, signalling upside risk potential of 20.18%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $42.23 which suggests that it could grow by 11.13%. Given that Driven Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe Driven Brands Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    6 5 0
    VVV
    Valvoline
    6 5 0
  • Is DRVN or VVV More Risky?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.176, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.585%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock DRVN or VVV?

    Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios DRVN or VVV?

    Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $516.2M, which are larger than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $403.2M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of $5.5M is lower than Valvoline's net income of $37.6M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Valvoline's PE ratio is 18.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.25x versus 2.94x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    DRVN
    Driven Brands Holdings
    1.25x 391.00x $516.2M $5.5M
    VVV
    Valvoline
    2.94x 18.45x $403.2M $37.6M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?
How High Can SharkNinja Stock Go?

If you know popular consumer appliance brands Shark and Ninja,…

Will Oklo Stock Double?
Will Oklo Stock Double?

Oklo (NYSE: OKLO) is only a year removed from its SPAC‑enabled debut,…

Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine
Why a $5 Stock Is Suddenly a Cash Machine

If you stopped tracking Grab Holdings (NASDAQ: GRAB) after its 2021 SPAC…

Stock Ideas

Buy
69
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 56x

Buy
62
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 43x

Sell
42
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 34x

Alerts

Buy
77
VBTX alert for Jul 15

Veritex Holdings [VBTX] is down 3.26% over the past day.

Buy
72
MNPR alert for Jul 15

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is down 8.6% over the past day.

Buy
56
NBIS alert for Jul 15

Nebius Group NV [NBIS] is up 2.98% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock