DEVS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enviro Serv has a net margin of -- compared to DevvStream's net margin of --. DevvStream's return on equity of -- beat Enviro Serv's return on equity of --.

DevvStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Enviro Serv has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DevvStream has higher upside potential than Enviro Serv, analysts believe DevvStream is more attractive than Enviro Serv.

DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enviro Serv has a beta of 0.682, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.76%.

DevvStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enviro Serv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DevvStream pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enviro Serv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DevvStream quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Enviro Serv quarterly revenues of --. DevvStream's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Enviro Serv's net income of --. Notably, DevvStream's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Enviro Serv's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DevvStream is -- versus -- for Enviro Serv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GFL Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to DevvStream's net margin of 5.48%. DevvStream's return on equity of -- beat GFL Environmental's return on equity of -8.01%.

DevvStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GFL Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $50.14 which suggests that it could grow by 12.14%. Given that GFL Environmental has higher upside potential than DevvStream, analysts believe GFL Environmental is more attractive than DevvStream.

DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GFL Environmental has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DevvStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GFL Environmental offers a yield of 0.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. DevvStream pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental pays out 55.07% of its earnings as a dividend. GFL Environmental's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

DevvStream quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than GFL Environmental quarterly revenues of $1.5B. DevvStream's net income of -$1.7M is lower than GFL Environmental's net income of $80.9M. Notably, DevvStream's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while GFL Environmental's PE ratio is 1,017.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DevvStream is -- versus 2.95x for GFL Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quest Water Global has a net margin of -- compared to DevvStream's net margin of --. DevvStream's return on equity of -- beat Quest Water Global's return on equity of --.

DevvStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Quest Water Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DevvStream has higher upside potential than Quest Water Global, analysts believe DevvStream is more attractive than Quest Water Global.

DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quest Water Global has a beta of 0.023, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.738%.

DevvStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quest Water Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DevvStream pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quest Water Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DevvStream quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Quest Water Global quarterly revenues of --. DevvStream's net income of -$1.7M is lower than Quest Water Global's net income of -$137.3K. Notably, DevvStream's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quest Water Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DevvStream is -- versus -- for Quest Water Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rainmaker Worldwide has a net margin of -- compared to DevvStream's net margin of --. DevvStream's return on equity of -- beat Rainmaker Worldwide's return on equity of --.

DevvStream has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rainmaker Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that DevvStream has higher upside potential than Rainmaker Worldwide, analysts believe DevvStream is more attractive than Rainmaker Worldwide.

DevvStream has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rainmaker Worldwide has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

DevvStream has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rainmaker Worldwide offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. DevvStream pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rainmaker Worldwide pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

DevvStream quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rainmaker Worldwide quarterly revenues of --. DevvStream's net income of -$1.7M is higher than Rainmaker Worldwide's net income of --. Notably, DevvStream's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rainmaker Worldwide's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for DevvStream is -- versus -- for Rainmaker Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.