CNEY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gulf Resources has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of -155.77%. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat Gulf Resources's return on equity of -49.67%.

CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11509.17%. On the other hand Gulf Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2295.11%. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than Gulf Resources, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than Gulf Resources.

CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gulf Resources has a beta of 0.181, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.855%.

CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gulf Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gulf Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gulf Resources quarterly revenues of $2.2M. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Gulf Resources's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gulf Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.02x versus 0.50x for Gulf Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IT Tech Packaging has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of -7.87%. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity of -5.89%.

CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11509.17%. On the other hand IT Tech Packaging has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than IT Tech Packaging, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than IT Tech Packaging.

CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.268, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.791%.

CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IT Tech Packaging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IT Tech Packaging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IT Tech Packaging quarterly revenues of $25.1M. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than IT Tech Packaging's net income of -$2M. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IT Tech Packaging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.02x versus 0.03x for IT Tech Packaging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ReTo Eco-Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of --. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat ReTo Eco-Solutions's return on equity of -85.96%.

CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11509.17%. On the other hand ReTo Eco-Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than ReTo Eco-Solutions, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than ReTo Eco-Solutions.

CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ReTo Eco-Solutions has a beta of 1.339, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.913%.

CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ReTo Eco-Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ReTo Eco-Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ReTo Eco-Solutions quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than ReTo Eco-Solutions's net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ReTo Eco-Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.02x versus 0.44x for ReTo Eco-Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Origin Agritech has a net margin of -- compared to CN Energy Group's net margin of --. CN Energy Group's return on equity of -4.2% beat Origin Agritech's return on equity of --.

CN Energy Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 11509.17%. On the other hand Origin Agritech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CN Energy Group has higher upside potential than Origin Agritech, analysts believe CN Energy Group is more attractive than Origin Agritech.

CN Energy Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.509, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.895%.

CN Energy Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Origin Agritech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CN Energy Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Agritech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CN Energy Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Origin Agritech quarterly revenues of --. CN Energy Group's net income of -- is lower than Origin Agritech's net income of --. Notably, CN Energy Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Origin Agritech's PE ratio is 1.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CN Energy Group is 0.02x versus 0.88x for Origin Agritech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.