CHCI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of -1.16%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 33.88% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -7.78%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.9%. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.44%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than Comstock Holding.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 94.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.564, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.36%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 2.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -141.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $12.6M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $954.9M. Comstock Holding's net income of $1.6M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$11M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.97x versus 0.30x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of 16.59%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 33.88% beat FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.48%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.9%. On the other hand FRP Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe Comstock Holding is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 94.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.233%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FRP Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $12.6M, which are larger than FRP Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Comstock Holding's net income of $1.6M is lower than FRP Holdings's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while FRP Holdings's PE ratio is 74.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.97x versus 12.11x for FRP Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The RMR Group has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of 2.17%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 33.88% beat The RMR Group's return on equity of 4.82%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.9%. On the other hand The RMR Group has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 47.24%. Given that The RMR Group has higher upside potential than Comstock Holding, analysts believe The RMR Group is more attractive than Comstock Holding.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 94.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The RMR Group has a beta of 1.134, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.427%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The RMR Group offers a yield of 11.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The RMR Group pays out 122.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $12.6M, which are smaller than The RMR Group quarterly revenues of $166.7M. Comstock Holding's net income of $1.6M is lower than The RMR Group's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while The RMR Group's PE ratio is 13.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.97x versus 0.34x for The RMR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 12.57% compared to Comstock Holding's net margin of -11997.76%. Comstock Holding's return on equity of 33.88% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of -612.91%.

Comstock Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -30.9%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Comstock Holding has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe Comstock Holding is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

Comstock Holding has a beta of 0.057, which suggesting that the stock is 94.311% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comstock Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comstock Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Comstock Holding quarterly revenues are $12.6M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $18.2K. Comstock Holding's net income of $1.6M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Comstock Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.94x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comstock Holding is 1.97x versus 7.29x for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.