AZPN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Creative Realities has a net margin of -28.01% compared to Aspen Technology's net margin of 0.37%. Aspen Technology's return on equity of -0.28% beat Creative Realities's return on equity of 2.65%.

Aspen Technology has a consensus price target of $246.28, signalling downside risk potential of -1.8%. On the other hand Creative Realities has an analysts' consensus of $8.33 which suggests that it could grow by 169.78%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Aspen Technology, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Aspen Technology.

Aspen Technology has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Realities has a beta of 3.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 220.506%.

Aspen Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Creative Realities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Realities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Technology quarterly revenues are $215.9M, which are larger than Creative Realities quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Aspen Technology's net income of -$60.5M is lower than Creative Realities's net income of $54K. Notably, Aspen Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Creative Realities's PE ratio is 18.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Technology is 14.56x versus 0.54x for Creative Realities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Digimarc has a net margin of -28.01% compared to Aspen Technology's net margin of -113.88%. Aspen Technology's return on equity of -0.28% beat Digimarc's return on equity of -56.45%.

Aspen Technology has a consensus price target of $246.28, signalling downside risk potential of -1.8%. On the other hand Digimarc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.27%. Given that Digimarc has more downside risk than Aspen Technology, analysts believe Aspen Technology is more attractive than Digimarc.

Aspen Technology has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digimarc has a beta of 1.699, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.892%.

Aspen Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Digimarc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digimarc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Technology quarterly revenues are $215.9M, which are larger than Digimarc quarterly revenues of $9.4M. Aspen Technology's net income of -$60.5M is lower than Digimarc's net income of -$10.8M. Notably, Aspen Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Digimarc's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Technology is 14.56x versus 20.47x for Digimarc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Matterport has a net margin of -28.01% compared to Aspen Technology's net margin of -87.69%. Aspen Technology's return on equity of -0.28% beat Matterport's return on equity of -53.91%.

Aspen Technology has a consensus price target of $246.28, signalling downside risk potential of -1.8%. On the other hand Matterport has an analysts' consensus of $5.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.82%. Given that Matterport has higher upside potential than Aspen Technology, analysts believe Matterport is more attractive than Aspen Technology.

Aspen Technology has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matterport has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aspen Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. Matterport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Matterport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Technology quarterly revenues are $215.9M, which are larger than Matterport quarterly revenues of $43.8M. Aspen Technology's net income of -$60.5M is lower than Matterport's net income of -$38.4M. Notably, Aspen Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Matterport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Technology is 14.56x versus 9.11x for Matterport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -28.01% compared to Aspen Technology's net margin of 4.75%. Aspen Technology's return on equity of -0.28% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 1.92%.

Aspen Technology has a consensus price target of $246.28, signalling downside risk potential of -1.8%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 49.42%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Aspen Technology, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Aspen Technology.

Aspen Technology has a beta of 0.759, which suggesting that the stock is 24.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.58%.

Aspen Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.21%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspen Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspen Technology quarterly revenues are $215.9M, which are larger than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $46.4M. Aspen Technology's net income of -$60.5M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Aspen Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 260.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspen Technology is 14.56x versus 6.53x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.