ASTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Aviat Networks has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 3.13%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Aviat Networks's return on equity of -0.91%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $43.73, signalling downside risk potential of -12.88%. On the other hand Aviat Networks has an analysts' consensus of $35.40 which suggests that it could grow by 54.79%. Given that Aviat Networks has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Aviat Networks is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aviat Networks has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.818%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Aviat Networks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aviat Networks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Aviat Networks quarterly revenues of $112.6M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than Aviat Networks's net income of $3.5M. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Aviat Networks's PE ratio is 29.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 1,950.06x versus 0.67x for Aviat Networks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cisco Systems has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of 17.61%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 21.48%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $43.73, signalling downside risk potential of -12.88%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $69.87 which suggests that it could grow by 5.36%. Given that Cisco Systems has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Cisco Systems is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.511%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $14.1B. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.5B. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 27.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 1,950.06x versus 4.79x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lantronix has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -13.57%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Lantronix's return on equity of -10.67%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $43.73, signalling downside risk potential of -12.88%. On the other hand Lantronix has an analysts' consensus of $5.13 which suggests that it could grow by 103.37%. Given that Lantronix has higher upside potential than AST SpaceMobile, analysts believe Lantronix is more attractive than AST SpaceMobile.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lantronix has a beta of 1.443, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.281%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lantronix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lantronix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Lantronix quarterly revenues of $28.5M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than Lantronix's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lantronix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 1,950.06x versus 0.67x for Lantronix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -6365.74% compared to AST SpaceMobile's net margin of -6.72%. AST SpaceMobile's return on equity of -66.1% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -21.64%.

AST SpaceMobile has a consensus price target of $43.73, signalling downside risk potential of -12.88%. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that AST SpaceMobile has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe AST SpaceMobile is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

AST SpaceMobile has a beta of 2.016, which suggesting that the stock is 101.624% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

AST SpaceMobile has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. AST SpaceMobile pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

AST SpaceMobile quarterly revenues are $718K, which are smaller than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.6M. AST SpaceMobile's net income of -$45.7M is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$240K. Notably, AST SpaceMobile's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for AST SpaceMobile is 1,950.06x versus 0.46x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.