AEVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Creative Realities has a net margin of -1035.24% compared to Aeva Technologies's net margin of 34.6%. Aeva Technologies's return on equity of -115.78% beat Creative Realities's return on equity of -0.11%.

Aeva Technologies has a consensus price target of $18.60, signalling downside risk potential of -28.74%. On the other hand Creative Realities has an analysts' consensus of $6.63 which suggests that it could grow by 98.95%. Given that Creative Realities has higher upside potential than Aeva Technologies, analysts believe Creative Realities is more attractive than Aeva Technologies.

Aeva Technologies has a beta of 1.945, which suggesting that the stock is 94.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Creative Realities has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.056%.

Aeva Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Creative Realities offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Creative Realities pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Creative Realities quarterly revenues of $9.7M. Aeva Technologies's net income of -$34.9M is lower than Creative Realities's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Aeva Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Creative Realities's PE ratio is 12.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies is 136.14x versus 0.72x for Creative Realities. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cycurion has a net margin of -1035.24% compared to Aeva Technologies's net margin of -264.82%. Aeva Technologies's return on equity of -115.78% beat Cycurion's return on equity of -159.42%.

Aeva Technologies has a consensus price target of $18.60, signalling downside risk potential of -28.74%. On the other hand Cycurion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aeva Technologies has higher upside potential than Cycurion, analysts believe Aeva Technologies is more attractive than Cycurion.

Aeva Technologies has a beta of 1.945, which suggesting that the stock is 94.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycurion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aeva Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cycurion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cycurion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than Cycurion quarterly revenues of $3.9M. Aeva Technologies's net income of -$34.9M is lower than Cycurion's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, Aeva Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cycurion's PE ratio is 6.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies is 136.14x versus 0.31x for Cycurion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CID Holdco has a net margin of -1035.24% compared to Aeva Technologies's net margin of --. Aeva Technologies's return on equity of -115.78% beat CID Holdco's return on equity of --.

Aeva Technologies has a consensus price target of $18.60, signalling downside risk potential of -28.74%. On the other hand CID Holdco has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aeva Technologies has higher upside potential than CID Holdco, analysts believe Aeva Technologies is more attractive than CID Holdco.

Aeva Technologies has a beta of 1.945, which suggesting that the stock is 94.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CID Holdco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aeva Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CID Holdco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CID Holdco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are larger than CID Holdco quarterly revenues of --. Aeva Technologies's net income of -$34.9M is higher than CID Holdco's net income of --. Notably, Aeva Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CID Holdco's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies is 136.14x versus -- for CID Holdco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PDF Solutions has a net margin of -1035.24% compared to Aeva Technologies's net margin of -6.35%. Aeva Technologies's return on equity of -115.78% beat PDF Solutions's return on equity of 0.59%.

Aeva Technologies has a consensus price target of $18.60, signalling downside risk potential of -28.74%. On the other hand PDF Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $31.75 which suggests that it could grow by 37.92%. Given that PDF Solutions has higher upside potential than Aeva Technologies, analysts believe PDF Solutions is more attractive than Aeva Technologies.

Aeva Technologies has a beta of 1.945, which suggesting that the stock is 94.477% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PDF Solutions has a beta of 1.462, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.232%.

Aeva Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PDF Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aeva Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PDF Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aeva Technologies quarterly revenues are $3.4M, which are smaller than PDF Solutions quarterly revenues of $47.8M. Aeva Technologies's net income of -$34.9M is lower than PDF Solutions's net income of -$3M. Notably, Aeva Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PDF Solutions's PE ratio is 767.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aeva Technologies is 136.14x versus 4.84x for PDF Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.